660 headphones: Sennheiser HD 660S review – SoundGuys

Sennheiser HD660s Review – A legend at a premium – Headphones.com

The HD 600-series from Sennheiser is, without a doubt, one of the most successful audiophile headphone lines ever created. The HD 650 and HD 600 have been around for almost two decades, but they continue to be a favorite amongst listeners. With its addition to the 600-series family in 2017, does the Sennheiser HD 660S live up to its legacy, and is it worth its $499 price tag?

🎧 Shop the Sennheiser HD 660S here at the best price

Sources and Music Used in Listening Tests

The Amplifier/DAC used in this review was the JDS Labs Element II connected via USB to my desktop computer. For the listening tests I used music from a wide variety of genres including Rock, Jazz, Classical, Acoustic, Hip-Hop, and Latin. I played tracks from my own FLAC library as well as from Qobuz streaming service.

What’s in the Box?

The HD 660S’ packaging is definitely on the more minimalistic side, but it does include just about everything you need to start listening. Included with the HD 660S are two cables; one has a ¼” termination, and the other one is 4.4mm balanced. I am not usually one to complain about cables, but I did want to mention that the included cables are both very long (3m) and they are not particularly easy to wrap up–they are quite unruly. Lastly, Sennheiser also includes a ¼’ to 3.5mm adapter.

Power Requirements

The HD 660S comes in at an impedance of 150ohms and a sensitivity of 104dB. I personally found them to have plenty of volume on most devices I tested, like my MacBook Air and Nintendo Switch. However, I did think that they sounded better when being fed power from my amplifier. When running them on devices without a discrete amplifier I thought that they sounded a little more compressed, so I will list an amplifier as recommended for these. Still, these are very efficient, so it does not have to be a very powerful amplifier. Amplifiers like the Liquid Spark and JDS Labs Atom will be more than enough to drive these very cleanly.

Build Quality and Comfort

The HD 660S rocks the traditional HD 600-series chassis but with a slick all-matte-black finish. With the exception of the outer grills, and inner headband, the HD 660S’ body is composed almost entirely out of plastic. Still, this is one of the most durable, and reliable headphone designs I have seen on a headphone. I have owned a couple of these Sennheiser headphones over the years, and not once have I had issues with their build quality. The only part on this headphone that will need replacing is the pads, which wear out extremely quickly. You will probably have to swap the pads out every year or so to ensure that they continue to deliver their intended sound.

Like the build quality, comfort is also very good on the HD 660S. Thanks to their mostly-plastic construction, these are extremely light (only 260g or so), so I doubt anyone will have weight issues with these. The pads use a fairly dense foam wrapped in velour and are very soft on the skin, I only wish that they were a bit wider on the inside as some people’s ears might touch the inner sides of the pads. The only problem I have with the comfort is that out-of-the-box, the clamp force can be quite vicious. Nonetheless, this can easily be alleviated by extending the headband all the way out and gently flexing the part that extends.


Right away I will say that these are my favorite headphones in Sennheiser’s line-up, and for the music that I listen to the most (classic rock), I really, really enjoy them. However, they are definitely not perfect, and–I think more importantly for the HD 660S–there is the question of value; which I will discuss towards the conclusion of this review.

For this sound section I will be going over the HD 660S’ tonal and technical performance while drawing comparisons to some of its competitors, as well as some of Sennheiser’s other offerings; namely the DROP X Sennheiser HD 6XX and HD 58X Jubilee.


Without a doubt, the bass region is where the HD 660S feels the most lacking. It actually has very good speed, it really is not all that far behind the DT 1990 Pro for detail in the lows. I also think the bass on these is more articulate than on the HD 6XX and 58X. However, where it really lags behind is in extension. The bass on the HD 660S rolls off aggressively starting at around 80hz, so you definitely will not be getting much sub-bass in this headphone. This shallowness in the bass is a very common trait amongst the HD-600 series headphones, and any improvements the HD 660S has for extension over its predecessors are negligible; they have nowhere near the level of depth that competitors like the HiFiMan Sundara, Audeze LCD-1 and DT 1990 can reproduce. The HD 660S also has a very small elevation at around 150hz; and while it is not not super noticeable, I did think it could overpower some of the frequencies that precede it, taking away some definition in bass-heavy tracks.


As expected from an HD 600-series Sennheiser, the mids on the HD 660S are simply spectacular. In terms of frequency response, they are simply perfect to my taste. The upper midrange on the HD 6XX and HD 58X came across as a little forward or shouty, as they had a little extra energy at around 3k-3. 5k, but this was not the case at all for me on the HD 660S; I found its upper midrange to be very smooth. The timbre on this headphone’s mids is–again, like the other headphones in the series–spot on and very natural sounding. For detail retrieval and resolution in the midrange, I thought that these performed great as well. From my listening, I personally found them to be an upgrade over its predecessors as well as a little more resolving than the LCD-1, Sundara and DT 1990 Pro in the mids.


The highs on the HD 660S are definitely the brightest of the HD 600-series headphones, and while I would not call them veiled, they are definitely still on the warmer side. For frequency response I only had two minor issues with the HD 660S’s treble. The more noticeable one was a peak in the lower treble at 5.5k, that–like on the HD 58X–made the HD 660S’ timbre sound a little bit more congested than on the HD 6XX and HD 600. Additionally, the frequencies above 10k could use a little more energy for my preference, I thought that they sounded a little muted. Aside from that, I still really enjoyed the treble and I found it to be very smooth overall. For resolution I think that they have very good detail in the highs; they are very resolving and clean in their delivery. Comparing them to other Sennheiser headphones, I thought that for resolution they were a little more resolving than the HD 6XX, and were a significant upgrade in treble detail from the HD 58X. I personally thought they were more detailed in the highs than the DT 1990 Pro, and they were on par with the HiFiMan Sundara.

Soundstage and Imaging

Unfortunately, the soundstage on the HD 660S leaves a lot to be desired, as it is very narrow. You do not get much width in these; they are easily outperformed in this category by Sundara, and definitely by the DT 1990 Pro. Their ability to image and determine location of sounds is also fairly lacking. Whilst they do have a very strong left, right, and center image, there seems to be a slight gap at front-left and front-right. For music I think they perform alright, but for other applications like watching movies or gaming, there are definitely more immersive stages on other headphones. Despite the weak soundstage and imaging, I found the HD 660S’ instrument separation to be outstanding. The HD 660S performed really great when it came to its ability to distinguish the individual layers making up tracks in complex musical passages, and it did so almost as well as the Sundara, which I personally thought was very impressive.


I think that the HD 660S performs decently well for dynamics. The HD 600-series definitely is not known for being punchy, but I still thought that the HD 660S performed slightly better than its predecessors in this category. It was by no means the strongest out there, but the HD 660S did have some punch slam. I found microdynamics to be fairly well-defined as well, as I felt like all elements in the mix had a fairly good sense of tension and presence. Overall, I would say that the HD 660S perform well in this category, although I do think that other headphones like the Sundara and DT 1990 Pro make for a more engaging and energetic experience in this regard.


As I usually do, I have created an EQ profile for the HD 660S that seeks to bring it closer to my personal target, which is similar to the Harman target. Via EQ, it is very easy to adjust for that elevation at 150hz, but it is not really possible to alleviate the lack of extension as the bass starts to distort early when pushed, so I only add a very conservative 2dB shelf under 100hz. For the mids I do not adjust anything at all, as I think that they match preference almost perfectly. In the highs, I add a peak adjustment filter to correct the peak at 5.5K, which cleans up the lower treble and gets rid of the congested tone I mentioned. I also like to add a high shelf of 1dB to the frequencies above 10k as they were a little muted for my preference. If you would like to try out my EQ for the HD 660S, you can input these setting sinto your EQ software of choice

My EQ settings when I applied in Roon’s built-in DSP Equalizer

Low Shelf at 80hz, +2dB Q of 0. 7

Peak at 150hz, -1.5dB Q of 1.4

Peak at 5500hz, -5.5dB Q of 5

High Shelf at 11000hz, +1dB Q of 0.7


I mentioned earlier in this review, that I considered value a very important factor when talking about the HD 660S. The reason for this is that, although they are a very good headphone, at their MSRP of $499 they are not as competitive when compared to some of the other options currently in the market. I think mainly of the HiFiMan Sundara and DROP X Sennheiser HD 6XX which greatly undercut the HD 660S in price while delivering tonal and technical performance parity or something close to it. The HD 6XX is available on DROP at $220, which is roughly half the price of the HD 660S’ MSRP. At $220, the HD 6XX achieves what I would consider to be a very close experience to that of the HD 660S. Then there is the Sundara, which at $349 has slightly better soundstage, significantly better bass, similar level of detail and an overall tonal balance that I think will keep up a bit better across more genres. For those reasons, I find it hard to give the HD 660S a strong recommendation despite them being really enjoyable and well-performing headphones. Should the HD 660S come down in price to around the $399 mark, I think they become a much more compelling option as they are an excellent set of headphones that I sincerely believe most listeners will enjoy.

Written by @Chrono

Watch the video review:

Join the discussion about the Sennheiser HD 660S on “The HEADPHONE Community” forum.

Buy the Sennheiser HD 660S at headphones.com at the best price, and its the best return-policy available.

Sennheiser HD 660 S Over-Ear Open Headphones Page 2

Sound Quality
On a gross level the HD 660 S sound is similar to the HD 600 and 650. Zooming in a little closer I’d characterize the HD 650 as the warmest of the bunch and the HD 660 S the brighter of the trio. Overall, I’d characterize the HD 660 S as a little lean.

To my ears this comes from two things: The HD 660 S has less of a broad upper-bass centered hump it’s virtually flat from 100Hz to 1kHz, and the bass falls off gradually below 100Hz. But I also hear a more forward presence region from 1kHz to 3kHz. To my ears the HD 650 (in stock form) does warrant the “veil” designation; the HD 600 a little; and the HD 660 S not hardly at all.

Imaging on the HD 660S does appear to be a bit deeper and wider, but it’s mostly quite like the other two headphones, which to my ears is good reasonably wide, and not particularly deep. The HD 660 S also appears to have more impact. You’ll notice I used the word “appear” in both those descriptions. There’s a reason for that…

The biggest difference I hear when switching from the HD 660 S to one of the other two, and I heard it immediately, is the fairly significant sense of a smoother and more refined sound of the previous cans. Switching back to the HD 660 S I hear it as grainy more more edgy in comparison. I’m quite saddened by this.

The HD 600 and HD 650 have for well over a decade been considered one of, if not the best headphone available. They are legend! Right on the HD 660 S box it says, “The Legend Continues.” Sadly, I think they are mistaken. Right off the bat, this graininess takes it out of the family’s rightly earned status.

But it gets worse. One of the defining characteristics of the HD 600/650 is a wonderfully smooth response. I had the good fortune once of sitting right in the circle with the Muir String Quartet and I was simply breathless with the absolutely smooth nature of the sound. Reproduced violins can take on a screechy character; in real life they are not at all. The HD 600/650 does a great job of portraying this smoothness. Very good treble response should give the impression of smooth detail. So many people mistake a bright, sizzly response for good detail. It just ain’t so.

The smooth detail of the 600/650 allow them to “scale” well, bringing out the advantages of upstream gear. I tried the the three headphones with my HeadRoom Max, Bottlehead Crack, and Simaudio 430HA amplifiers. The differences were readily apparent with the 600/650, but was much less so with the HD 660 S. The grainy character got in the way.

While the HD 660 S was a bit brighter than the other two, it also lacked the nuanced resolution and dynamic balance of the 600/650. Low level details were lost, and grosser detail seemed compressed into a similar level of response. My measurements show these cans as far more similar than they actually sound to the ear.

To make matters worse, the design of the HD 660 S driver makes them less able to be modified by DIYers. Ugh.

What the…
I just don’t understand what Sennheiser was trying to accomplish with these headphones. The intro to their product page says right off the bat:

The new HD 660 S lets you enjoy sophisticated audiophile sound in even more listening situations. The successor of the legendary HD 650 excels with the improved performance of its new transducer design. Thanks to its lower impedance, it delivers reference-class sound also when connected to hi-res mobile players, thus offering much greater versatility.

A) The HD 660 S is only a dB or two more voltage efficient, so there’s only a modest difference in volume from a phone. On its product page, Sennheiser claims 104dB/Volt for the HD 660 S; in its manual, Sennheiser say the HD 650 has 103dB/Volt sensitivity. Higher-end portable players will all have plenty of voltage to drive a 600/650 to loud levels.

2) If you’re going to tout a product as being more useful in portable applications you should include a short cable in the mix. Both included cables are far too large for that sort of thing; neither are terminated in a 3.5mm plug—for the moment at least, still the most common connector on portable devices. Add the 1/4″ to 3.5mm short cable adapter and you have a fairly clumsy connection to portable devices.

I’ve also seen a post where a Head-Fi made an inquiry to Sennheiser about whether the HD 600 or HD 650 would be discontinued. The Sennheiser representative said the HD 660 S will replace the HD 650 in the line-up, and the older model will be discontinued. I’ve personally always preferred the HD 600, but acknowledge the HD 650 has a lovely sound many might prefer.

I’m bummed.

Were it any other maker producing the HD 660 S I would have been quite impressed with how close they managed to get to the sound of the legendary HD 600/650. But from Sennheiser themselves producing it and with plans to discontinue the HD 650 I can only shake my head in disbelief.

I loath the race to lower headphone impedance in high-end headphones to make them more compatible with portable devices. My experience with the three beyerdynamic DT880 versions with varying impedance gives me the strong belief that higher impedance headphones will outperform lower impedance cans of the same design. Unfortunately I think this holds true with the new lower impedance HD 660 S.

The new Sennheiser HD 660 S lacks the legendary smooth resolve of the HD 600/650, preventing it from scaling well as upstream gear is improved—one of, if not the most, important characteristics of a great enthusiast headphone. If you’re not getting improvements on money spent on electronics you’re missing out on half the fun.

Yes, I’ll give these headphones a soft recommendation…they remain a decent headphone—comfortable, stylish, and close to as good as an HD 600. Maybe the stealth black look and smartphone capable efficiency is enough to tip the balance for some. But I’ll also steer buyers towards the HD 600—or Massdrop HD 6XX if it becomes available again—as the better sounding alternative.

Sennheiser U.S.A. home page and HD 660 S product page.
Head-Fi impressions thread, sponsored thread, and reviews.
Superbestaudiofriends.org impressions thread and 600/650/660S analysis thread.

EP-660 – Headphones – Creative Labs (Russia)

EP-660 – Headphones – Creative Labs (Russia)

We use cookies, which are small text files, to improve your experience on our site and to show you personalized content. You can allow all or manage them individually.

Necessary Cookies

These cookies are essential for the full functionality of the site. They cannot be disabled. Link with detailed information

Analytical Cookies

These cookies help improve our website. This is done anonymously and helps us obtain information about site performance and usage. Learn more

Third Party Cookies

These cookies help us to contact you through other websites with marketing communications and special offers. Find out more at link

Notify Me

Buy EP-660

Creative EP-660 bright noise-isolating in-ear headphones let you not only listen to music comfortably, but also look stylish. Enjoy incredibly smooth sound with a unique curved sound chamber design that carries sound from a high-performance neodymium driver for dynamic bass reproduction. The headphones are ideal for use with MP3 players, iPods, iPads and tablet devices. The package includes soft silicone eartips in several sizes – choose the one that fits your EP-660 headphones comfortably. Available in five vibrant colors – pearl white, deep blue, hot pink, yellow green and deep black – choose the one that best suits your unique style!

  • High-Performance Neodymium Speakers
    • High-performance 9mm neodymium drivers deliver dynamic, full-range bass reproduction optimized for listening to MP3 players, iPods, iPads and tablets.
  • Curved bore sound chamber
    • Designed with ear canal ergonomics in mind, the EP-660 features a unique curved bore sound chamber that reproduces soft sound across the entire acoustic range.
  • Noise-isolating ear tips
    • Noise-isolating ear tips for passive attenuation of ambient noise.
  • Soft Silicone Eartips
    • Soft Silicone Eartips* available in S, M, L for personal comfort.
  • 5 original color options
    • Available in five unique colors: pearl white, deep blue, hot pink, yellow green and deep black

*White ear tips are supplied with the EP-660 in all colors except black.

Earphones extremely comfortable to wear and the sound quality is first class, whether used on my computer or on my Zen Nano plus mp3 player.

  • Drivers: 9 mm with neodymium magnet
  • Frequency response: 6 Hz – 23 kHz
  • Impedance: 16 ohm
  • Sensitivity (1 kHz): 106 dB/mW
  • Cable length: 1. 2 m (phthalate-free cable)
  • Input jack: 3.5 mm gold-plated stereo mini jack
  • Net weight: 9 g (without packaging)
  • 1 pair of Creative EP-660 headphones
  • 1 pair of silicone tips in sizes S, M and L

Best headphones for smartphones or phone | MDR-ZX660AP